First off, what a
fantastic speech! Governor Romney gave the county a rousing concoction of
rhetorical delight. For purposes of analysis, I will simply speak of his
writing in the three main rhetorical categories: Logos, pathos, and ethos.
Logically, the speech was valid and sound – not to mention timely – within and
without. Romney began by mentioning the many threats to America’s power in the
world, from China’s economy to radical Islam. He ended the speech with the
same, preceded by support for the problem and followed by a solution to it.
Pathos
was certainly one of Romney’s strong-suits in this speech. His main appeal to
passion and emotion was the idea of again uniting the people of the United
States. He appealed to the goodness of the many different religions in America
and used that to support his call for tolerance and a restoration of religious
freedom – or at least putting a stop to the erosion of political freedom in the
U.S. He used phrases like, “I think they underestimate the American people,”
and “These are not bases for bases for criticism but rather a test of our
tolerance.” He offered a sense of empowerment to his American audience.
Romney
also provided a wealth of ethos, appealing to a number of credible and powerful
sources, from the then current president to John Adams and the Founders to
President Abraham Lincoln – and the quotes that he used were all excellent
support for his argument to re-unify the American people and re-free the
America’s religions.
He definitely used a bunch of ethos when referring to multiple founders and former president's of the United States. Although he was trying to unite America by referring to all religions, he in actuality separated non-religious Americans from the rest. For some of the audience it would be very effective, but for others it was offensive
ReplyDelete